I've converted this to a draft as there are still some problems with the second example. Specifically, I'm getting errors that look like this in the terminal window where I launched the inspector:

Error from MCP server: SyntaxError: Unexpected token '/', "/usr/local"... is not valid JSON
    at JSON.parse (<anonymous>)
    at deserializeMessage (file:///Users/mikekistler/.npm/_npx/5a9d879542beca3a/node_modules/@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/dist/esm/shared/stdio.js:26:44)
    at ReadBuffer.readMessage (file:///Users/mikekistler/.npm/_npx/5a9d879542beca3a/node_modules/@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/dist/esm/shared/stdio.js:19:16)
    at StdioClientTransport.processReadBuffer (file:///Users/mikekistler/.npm/_npx/5a9d879542beca3a/node_modules/@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/dist/esm/client/stdio.js:114:50)
    at Socket.<anonymous> (file:///Users/mikekistler/.npm/_npx/5a9d879542beca3a/node_modules/@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/dist/esm/client/stdio.js:93:22)
    at Socket.emit (node:events:518:28)
    at addChunk (node:internal/streams/readable:561:12)
    at readableAddChunkPushByteMode (node:internal/streams/readable:512:3)
    at Readable.push (node:internal/streams/readable:392:5)
    at Pipe.onStreamRead (node:internal/stream_base_commons:189:23)

Also, these same examples appear in the src/ModelContextProtocol/README.md file. We should decide if we need the same examples both places or if we could only put them in one file and reference them from the other. If we decide to keep them in both files then the other file will need to be fixed as well.

@mikekistler, I think your local repo needs to be sync'd. The readme you're editing has already progressed further in main, and the one in the src/mpc folder was already deleted.

(Also, fwiw, all the further issues I found in the readme are fixed in #126, but as that hasn't been merged yet, feel free to make changes separately.)

Thanks @stephentoub ... I will wait for you to merge #126 and then fixup this PR to anything still missing.

@mikekistler, my changes merged. Can you update your PR with whatever additional changes you'd like on top of that?

@mikekistler, are you still planning to evolve this, or should we close it for now?

Closing for now as there have been many improvements to the README.